Colleen Hanycz is a force to be reckoned with, leading Xavier University through a transformative journey. But what's her vision for the students? She wants them to have a 'bigger life'.
In 2021, Hanycz stepped into the role of president at a pivotal moment. With enrollment and budget concerns looming, she took swift action. The university increased fundraising efforts, cut expenses, and diversified its academic offerings by introducing new majors. They even established an on-campus elementary school, fostering a vibrant community.
But here's where it gets controversial: Hanycz's administration made a bold move to require most juniors and all first- and second-year students to live on campus. This decision sparked debates about student autonomy and campus life.
And that's not all. The university is constructing a $109 million College of Osteopathic Medicine, the first of its kind in Ohio in 50 years. This ambitious project aligns with Hanycz's vision of training physicians with a deep sense of compassion and justice.
Hanycz's academic journey began in Canada, where she earned a law degree and practiced as a securities litigator. She later transitioned into academia, becoming an associate professor and assistant dean. In 2015, she made history as the first female president of La Salle University, a Catholic institution in Philadelphia.
At Xavier, Hanycz is breaking barriers as the 35th president, the first layperson, and the first woman to hold the position. Her personal life has also been marked by tragedy, as she lost a daughter in an accident in 2017.
When asked about attracting more students, Hanycz emphasizes transparency in tuition and scholarships, as well as providing real-world experiences. She believes these factors will draw students seeking purpose and growth.
The new medical school is Hanycz's top priority for 2026, as it embodies the university's mission of care and service. But will this ambitious project pay off? Only time will tell.
Hanycz's motivation is clear: the students. She finds inspiration in their growth and their commitment to service. But is this enough to navigate the challenges of modern higher education?
What do you think? Is Hanycz's approach to student life and university management innovative or controversial? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
